Environmental Information
Environmental Studies
 |
|
 |
Transmission line, access roads (upgrading and
new sections), headpond and project area* assessed in summer
2004 |
 |
2890 cubic metres of merchantable timber would
be cleared for project
facilities (mostly transmission line and access roads, less
than 125m3
within main project area* including headpond) |
| Terrestrial Vegetation and Wetlands |
|
|
 |
Transmission line, access roads (upgrading and
new sections),
headpond and project area* assessed in summer 2004 |
 |
Dominant forest types include upland trembling
aspen, white birch
and black spruce communities and lowland swamps of black spruce
and speckled alder, which are typical of this part of NW Ontario |
 |
Seven wetland vegetation communities present
in the headpond area,
consisting of two swamps, two open water areas and three wet
meadow marshes. Several small fens were identified within the
project area |
 |
No rare species or vegetation or wetland communities
were found in the project area |
| Archaeological/Heritage Survey |
|
|
 |
Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological and Heritage impact
assessment
undertaken of project area* in summer 2004 |
 |
Some water washed flakes and a medicine bottle
from 1880’s found
near the future diversion channel entrance |
 |
Study found low potential for archaeological
or heritage resources |
 |
Ministry of Culture has provided a letter clearing
the area for
development |
|
 |
| * |
 |
project area defined as overflow weir, intake
and sluice structures, powerhouse and switchyyard and associated
work/laydown areas |
|
|
|
| Traditional Values Survey |
|
Fish Community and Habitat |
 |
Elders were consulted during 2004 to determine presence of
traditional ecological, cultural and/or spiritual values within
project areas |
 |
No significant values to be affected
by proposed project |
| |
| Recreational Use Survey |
 |
A survey of recreational users (by canoe, ATV and mountain
bike)
was conducted in 2004 from June to September |
 |
149 people visited the area, with 126 by water and 23 by
land |
 |
Approximately 50% viewed the upper falls area and about 2/3
viewed
Umbata Falls |
 |
Many expressed a desire to maintain the isolation
of the area, and
keep the area as natural as possible |
 |
Six expressed outright opposition to the project (not be
built), three
expressed full support |
| |
|
|
|
 |
Studies conducted in
spring and summer 2003, and summer 2004 |
 |
Areas surveyed include the upper
part of the head pond, below the
gorge, and below the Hydro bridge |
 |
Primary species include walleye,
northern pike, white sucker and
small forage species
Head Pond Area |
|
 |
One pike captured in 2003 |
 |
Upstream fish community of at least
10 fish species including walleye,
northern pike, yellow perch, white sucker and forage species |
 |
Limited habitat beyond the pool below
the upper falls (due to high
flow velocity and limited cover) |
|
 |
Fish habitat observations in the
gorge are limited to those available
from shoreline vantage points |
 |
Gorge offers no fish habitat due
to high velocity flows and scoured
bedrock substrate |
 |
No fish access to the gorge due to
flow velocity and gradient change
at gorge mouth |
| Gorge to Hydro-One
Bridge |
|
|
 |
Walleye spawn below the gorge, likely over the
boulder/cobble bar during high spring flows
(suitable habitat and mature walleye collected
during 2003 spawning season) |
 |
Nursery habitat for young-of-the-year white sucker
in backwater bays in this area |
 |
Other species collected include burbot, logperch,
longnose sucker and johnny darter |
| Downstream of Hydro-One
Bridge |
|
|
 |
Walleye, northern pike and yellow perch are
dominant species in this area |
 |
Area characterized by slow moving reaches and
backwater bays, interspersed with islands and shoals |
 |
Rapids at Hydro-One bridge may limit access to the
preceding area for small fish and those with limited
swimming ability |
|
Proceed to next section:
Economic
Analysis
|