Hydroelectric Development on Umbata Falls

Scenic Flow Adaptive Management Plan

Crest Modification Option

Modification of the crest of the falls to spread the flow over the width of the main flow channel (approximately 8 m wide) was the preferred option identified in the environmental assessment report. However, as the river corridor was being regulated as a ‘Natural Environment’ addition to White Lake Provincial Park, it was subsequently agreed that any potential for crest modification would be assessed after the project was constructed and operational.

This option would involve filling the depression on the left side of the falls (as viewed from downstream – see location of water flow in base case situation photo) with reinforced concrete or other suitable material such that flow is distributed more evenly across the entire width of the falls crest. Measures would be taken to ensure that turbulence and a natural appearance are maintained (i.e. embed boulders and/or shaped surfaces to mimic existing crest characteristics). The graphical representations on the right show the anticipated view at 1, 3 and 6 m3/s with a modified crest.

While the implementation of this option would incur an additional capital expense that would be added to project debt, it could also increase the project revenues for the 1 m3/s and 3 m3/s flows in the same manner as noted for the previously described “Less Flow” option. The 6 m3/s option would maintain the status quo in terms of benefits to the Ojibways of the Pic River First Nation (see “Base Case Situation”), while providing a more scenic viewing experience.

It should be noted that during periods of low flow, the amount of flow that could be released over the falls is limited to the actual flow in the river.

Variable Flow Timing Options

The variable flow timing option would vary the flow over the falls between active viewing and non-viewing periods. For example, activation of a remote sensor would increase the flow over the falls during visitation periods (by reducing the flow through the facility), while flow would be lower at other times when no one is viewing the falls. Alternately, a manually operated device could be located at the powerhouse to allow visitors to increase the flow when they are on-site and ready to visit the falls.

The option would provide for a more scenic experience, as higher flows could be attained during the short intervals that visitors are present, as compared to the constant flow presently provided during daylight hours from May 15 to September 15 annually. The photos on the right illustrate the base case situation as well as the scenic experience that could be attained with this option. The 12 and 24 m3/s options are based on average viewing periods of 2 hours per day during the months of July and August, and 1 hour per day during the months of May, June and September. This results in a total of 184 hours, which corresponds to approximately the long term average number of visitors to the site per year

It should be noted that during periods of low flow, the amount of flow that could be released over the falls is limited to the actual flow in the river.

 


Options

Next: Online Survey

Back: Decreased or Increased Flow

Home: Scenic Flow Adaptive Management Plan




Umbata Hydroelectric Project
Copyright © 2004-2007 Begetekong Power Corporation • www.BegetekongPower.com